G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 vs Radeon RX 460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 vs Radeon RX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015

Why buy it

✅10.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
35.5% HIGHER MSRP
$149 MSRPvs$110 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.6 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
❌46.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 75W.

Radeon RX 460

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $39 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 30.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 110W, a 35W reduction.
✅Measures 170mm instead of 220mm, a 50mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.9% in PassMark G3D (4,260 vs 4,099), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 460 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $39 cheaper on MSRP at $110 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 30.3% (37.3 vs 28.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon RX 460 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 vs Radeon RX 460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

Radeon RX 460

The Radeon RX 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1090 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,099 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 scores 4,260 and the Radeon RX 460 reaches 4,099 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 2.15 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Radeon RX 460
G3D Mark Score	4,260+4%	4,099
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1280+43%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.496 TFLOPS+16%	2.15 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	975 MHz	1200 MHz+23%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+43%	56
L1 Cache	384 KB+71%	224 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Radeon RX 460
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 460 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 460 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 460) — a 60% advantage for the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 460. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 460) — the Radeon RX 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Radeon RX 460
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	179.2 GB/s+60%	112 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 460). Vulkan: 1.2 vs Supported. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Radeon RX 460
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (FL 12_0)
Vulkan	1.2	Supported
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 460).

Feature	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Radeon RX 460
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 3.4
Decoder	UVD 4.0	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 draws 110W versus the Radeon RX 460's 75W — a 37.8% difference. The Radeon RX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 220mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Radeon RX 460
TDP	110W	75W-32%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Length	220mm	170mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70	—
Perf/Watt	38.7	54.7+41%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 came in at $149, while the Radeon RX 460 launched at $110. On MSRP, Radeon RX 460 was 26.2% cheaper ($39 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 460) — the Radeon RX 460 offers 30.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 460 (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Radeon RX 460
MSRP	$149	$110-26%
Performance per Dollar	28.6	37.3+30%
Codename	Trinidad	Baffin
Release	May 5 2015	August 8 2016
Ranking	#456	#485

Search Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.