Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
VS
Radeon RX 460

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 vs Radeon RX 460

AMD

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 975 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 460

2016Core: 1090 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 460 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R9 270 / R7 370Radeon RX 460
Performance
Leading raw performance (+3.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-3.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 460 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 460 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $149), it costs 77% less, resulting in a 309.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 270 / R7 370Radeon RX 460
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+309.6%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($149)
More affordable ($35)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 and Radeon RX 460

AMD

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 460

The Radeon RX 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1090 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,099 points. Launch price was $86.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 scores 4,260 and the Radeon RX 460 reaches 4,099 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 2.15 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 270 / R7 370Radeon RX 460
G3D Mark Score
4,260+4%
4,099
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1280+43%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.496 TFLOPS+16%
2.15 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
975 MHz
1200 MHz+23%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+43%
56
L1 Cache
384 KB+71%
224 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 270 / R7 370Radeon RX 460
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 460 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 460 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 460) — a 60% advantage for the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 460) — the Radeon RX 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 270 / R7 370Radeon RX 460
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s+60%
112 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 460). Vulkan: 1.2 vs Supported. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon R9 270 / R7 370Radeon RX 460
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (FL 12_0)
Vulkan
1.2
Supported
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 460).

FeatureRadeon R9 270 / R7 370Radeon RX 460
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 3.4
Decoder
UVD 4.0
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 draws 110W versus the Radeon RX 460's 75W — a 37.8% difference. The Radeon RX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 220mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon R9 270 / R7 370Radeon RX 460
TDP
110W
75W-32%
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
220mm
170mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
38.7
54.7+41%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $149, while the Radeon RX 460 launched at $110 and now averages $35. The Radeon RX 460 costs 76.5% less ($114 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 117.1 (Radeon RX 460) — the Radeon RX 460 offers 309.4% better value. The Radeon RX 460 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon R9 270 / R7 370Radeon RX 460
MSRP
$149
$110-26%
Avg Price (30d)
$149
$35-77%
Performance per Dollar
28.6
117.1+309%
Codename
Trinidad
Baffin
Release
May 5 2015
August 8 2016
Ranking
#456
#485