Radeon R9 360
VS
FirePro W5000

Radeon R9 360 vs FirePro W5000

AMD

Radeon R9 360

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
VS

FirePro W5000

2012Core: 825 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 360 is positioned at rank 179 and the FirePro W5000 is on rank 216, so the Radeon R9 360 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 360

#169
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
354%
#171
321%
#172
320%
#176
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
291%
#177
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
289%
#179
Radeon R9 360
MSRP: $99|Avg: $55
100%
#180
100%
#181
GeForce GTX 460M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
99%
#182
Radeon 6750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
99%
#183
GeForce GT 525M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
98%
#185
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
98%
#187
GeForce MX550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W5000

#92
RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
99%
#93
Quadro RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
99%
#94
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799
89%
#201
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2984%
#216
FirePro W5000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
100%
#219
FirePro W7000 Adapter
MSRP: $899|Avg: $15
99%
#220
Quadro K420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
98%
#223
FirePro W7000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $50
97%
#224
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $100
96%
#226
FirePro D500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
92%
#227
FirePro 3D V4800
MSRP: $189|Avg: $20
91%
#231
GRID T4-2Q
MSRP: $845|Avg: $600
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 360 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W5000.

InsightRadeon R9 360FirePro W5000
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro W5000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W5000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $55), it costs 27% less, resulting in a 34.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 360FirePro W5000
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+34.6%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($55)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 360 and FirePro W5000

AMD

Radeon R9 360

The Radeon R9 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,032 points.

AMD

FirePro W5000

The FirePro W5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,967 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 360 scores 3,032 and the FirePro W5000 reaches 2,967 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 360 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro W5000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R9 360) vs 768 (FirePro W5000). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 360) vs 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro W5000).

FeatureRadeon R9 360FirePro W5000
G3D Mark Score
3,032+2%
2,967
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
768+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9472 TFLOPS
1.267 TFLOPS+34%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
48+50%
L1 Cache
128 KB
192 KB+50%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 360FirePro W5000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 360) vs 512 KB (FirePro W5000) — the FirePro W5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 360FirePro W5000
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 360) vs 12 (FirePro W5000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2.170. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureRadeon R9 360FirePro W5000
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2.170
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 360) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W5000). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 360) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W5000).

FeatureRadeon R9 360FirePro W5000
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 360 draws 30W versus the FirePro W5000's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R9 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 360) vs 350W (FirePro W5000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 183mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon R9 360FirePro W5000
TDP
30W-60%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
165mm
183mm
Height
110mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
75
75°C
Perf/Watt
101.1+155%
39.6
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 360 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $55, while the FirePro W5000 launched at $599 and now averages $40. The FirePro W5000 costs 27.3% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.1 (Radeon R9 360) vs 74.2 (FirePro W5000) — the FirePro W5000 offers 34.7% better value. The Radeon R9 360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon R9 360FirePro W5000
MSRP
$99-83%
$599
Avg Price (30d)
$55
$40-27%
Performance per Dollar
55.1
74.2+35%
Codename
Tropo
Pitcairn
Release
May 5 2015
August 7 2012
Ranking
#711
#585