Radeon R9 360
VS
Radeon HD 6990

Radeon R9 360 vs Radeon HD 6990

AMD

Radeon R9 360

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6990

2011Core: 830 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 360 is positioned at rank #179 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 360

#169
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
354%
#171
321%
#172
320%
#176
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
291%
#177
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
289%
#179
Radeon R9 360
MSRP: $99|Avg: $55
100%
#180
100%
#181
GeForce GTX 460M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
99%
#182
Radeon 6750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
99%
#183
GeForce GT 525M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
98%
#185
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
98%
#187
GeForce MX550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 360 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6990.

InsightRadeon R9 360Radeon HD 6990
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (310mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 360 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 360 holds the technical lead. Priced at $55 (vs $498), it costs 89% less, resulting in a 810.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 360Radeon HD 6990
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+810.9%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($55)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($498)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 360 and Radeon HD 6990

AMD

Radeon R9 360

The Radeon R9 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,032 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6990

The Radeon HD 6990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,014 points. Launch price was $699.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 360 scores 3,032 and the Radeon HD 6990 reaches 3,014 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 360 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6990 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R9 360) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6990). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 360) vs 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6990).

FeatureRadeon R9 360Radeon HD 6990
G3D Mark Score
3,032
3,014
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
512
1536 ×2+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9472 TFLOPS
2.55 TFLOPS ×2+169%
ROPs
16
32 ×2+100%
TMUs
32
96 ×2+200%
L1 Cache
128 KB
384 KB+200%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 360Radeon HD 6990
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 360) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6990) — the Radeon HD 6990 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 360Radeon HD 6990
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 360) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6990). Vulkan: 1.2 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.

FeatureRadeon R9 360Radeon HD 6990
DirectX
12 (12_0)+7%
11.2
Vulkan
1.2
None
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
4
5+25%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 360) vs None (Radeon HD 6990). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 360) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 6990).

FeatureRadeon R9 360Radeon HD 6990
Encoder
VCE 2.0
None
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 3.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 360 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 6990's 375W — a 170.4% difference. The Radeon R9 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 360) vs 750W (Radeon HD 6990). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 165mm vs 310mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85.

FeatureRadeon R9 360Radeon HD 6990
TDP
30W-92%
375W
Recommended PSU
350W-53%
750W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 8-pin
Length
165mm
310mm
Height
110mm
115mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75-12%
85
Perf/Watt
101.1+1164%
8.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 360 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $55, while the Radeon HD 6990 launched at $699 and now averages $498. The Radeon R9 360 costs 89% less ($443 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.1 (Radeon R9 360) vs 6.1 (Radeon HD 6990) — the Radeon R9 360 offers 803.3% better value. The Radeon R9 360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon R9 360Radeon HD 6990
MSRP
$99-86%
$699
Avg Price (30d)
$55-89%
$498
Performance per Dollar
55.1+803%
6.1
Codename
Tropo
Antilles
Release
May 5 2015
March 8 2011
Ranking
#711
#583