
Radeon R9 360 vs Radeon Pro 455

Radeon R9 360
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 455
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 360 is positioned at rank #179 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 360
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 455 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 360.
| Insight | Radeon R9 360 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 455 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 455 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $55), it costs 27% less, resulting in a 41.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 360 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+41.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($55) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 360 and Radeon Pro 455

Radeon R9 360
The Radeon R9 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,032 points.

Radeon Pro 455
The Radeon Pro 455 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,113 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 360 scores 3,032 and the Radeon Pro 455 reaches 3,113 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 360 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro 455 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R9 360) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 455). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 360) vs 1.313 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 455).
| Feature | Radeon R9 360 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,032 | 3,113+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 768+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9472 TFLOPS | 1.313 TFLOPS+39% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 360 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 360) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 455) — the Radeon Pro 455 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 360 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 360) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 455). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R9 360 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 360) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 455). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Radeon R9 360 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 360 draws 30W versus the Radeon Pro 455's 35W — a 15.4% difference. The Radeon R9 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 360) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 455). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 360 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-14% | 35W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 165mm | 1mm |
| Height | 110mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.1+14% | 88.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 360 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $55, while the Radeon Pro 455 launched at $0 and now averages $40. The Radeon Pro 455 costs 27.3% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.1 (Radeon R9 360) vs 77.8 (Radeon Pro 455) — the Radeon Pro 455 offers 41.2% better value. The Radeon Pro 455 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 360 | Radeon Pro 455 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $55 | $40-27% |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.1 | 77.8+41% |
| Codename | Tropo | Baffin |
| Release | May 5 2015 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #711 | #577 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















