
Radeon R9 360 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Radeon R9 360
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 360 is positioned at rank #179 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 360
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 360.
| Insight | Radeon R9 360 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $55), it costs 9% less, resulting in a 11.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 360 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+11.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($55) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 360 and GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Radeon R9 360
The Radeon R9 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,032 points.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,080 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 360 scores 3,032 and the GeForce GTX 560 Ti reaches 3,080 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 360 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R9 360) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 360) vs 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon R9 360 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,032 | 3,080+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9472 TFLOPS | 1.263 TFLOPS+33% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 360 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 360) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 360 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 360) vs 11_0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon R9 360 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0)+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 360) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 Ti). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 360) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon R9 360 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 360 draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 560 Ti's 160W — a 136.8% difference. The Radeon R9 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 360) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 165mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 360 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-81% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 165mm | 229mm |
| Height | 110mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.1+424% | 19.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 360 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $55, while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti launched at $249 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti costs 9.1% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.1 (Radeon R9 360) vs 61.6 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 560 Ti offers 11.8% better value. The Radeon R9 360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon R9 360 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-60% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $55 | $50-9% |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.1 | 61.6+12% |
| Codename | Tropo | GF114 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | January 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #711 | #580 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















