
Radeon R9 370
Popular choices:

GRID T4-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID T4-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID T4-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 370 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 370 | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 370 holds the technical lead. Priced at $55 (vs $1,000), it costs 95% less, resulting in a 1702.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 370 | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1702.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($55) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 370 and GRID T4-8Q

Radeon R9 370
The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

GRID T4-8Q
The GRID T4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,762 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 370 scores 4,722 and the GRID T4-8Q reaches 4,762 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID T4-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 370) vs 1,536 (GRID T4-8Q). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID T4-8Q).
| Feature | Radeon R9 370 | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,722 | 4,762 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1536+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.496 TFLOPS+13% | 2.218 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 96+20% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 576 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 370 | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 370 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID T4-8Q has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 370 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 370) vs 2 MB (GRID T4-8Q) — the GRID T4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 370 | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 370 draws 110W versus the GRID T4-8Q's 100W — a 9.5% difference. The GRID T4-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R9 370) vs 350W (GRID T4-8Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 370 | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W | 100W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 221mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 42.9 | 47.6+11% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 370 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $55, while the GRID T4-8Q launched at $2500 and now averages $1000. The Radeon R9 370 costs 94.5% less ($945 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 85.9 (Radeon R9 370) vs 4.8 (GRID T4-8Q) — the Radeon R9 370 offers 1689.6% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R9 370 | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-94% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $55-95% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 85.9+1690% | 4.8 |
| Codename | Trinidad | GM204 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #456 | #535 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













