Radeon R9 370
VS
GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Radeon R9 370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB

AMD

Radeon R9 370

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 975 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Core: 675 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R9 370 is significantly newer (2015 vs 0). The Radeon R9 370 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 370 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R9 370GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Fermi (2010−2014) (Standard Node)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 460 768MB remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 370 and GeForce GTX 460 768MB

AMD

Radeon R9 370

The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 768MB

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 370 scores 4,722 and the GeForce GTX 460 768MB reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 460 768MB uses Fermi. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 370) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB).

FeatureRadeon R9 370GeForce GTX 460 768MB
G3D Mark Score
4,722
4,800+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi
Shading Units
1280+281%
336

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 370GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 370 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 768MB has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 370 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 179 GB/s (Radeon R9 370) vs 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) — a 107.2% advantage for the Radeon R9 370. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit.

FeatureRadeon R9 370GeForce GTX 460 768MB
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
179 GB/s+107%
86.4 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+33%
192-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 370) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon R9 370GeForce GTX 460 768MB
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 370) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC (Radeon R9 370) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 768MB).

FeatureRadeon R9 370GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Encoder
VCE 1.0
PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder
UVD 4.0
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 370 draws 110W versus the GeForce GTX 460 768MB's 75W — a 37.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R9 370) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 221mm vs 210mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon R9 370GeForce GTX 460 768MB
TDP
110W
75W-32%
Recommended PSU
450W
450W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
2x 6-pin
Length
221mm
210mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75
70°C-7%
Perf/Watt
42.9
64.0+49%