G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 370 vs Radeon R9 Nano FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 370 vs Radeon R9 Nano: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 370

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 346.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 110W instead of 175W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Nano across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌45.4% longer card at 221mm vs 152mm.

Radeon R9 Nano

2015

Why buy it

✅46.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Measures 152mm instead of 221mm, a 69mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
335.6% HIGHER MSRP
$649 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌59.1% higher power demand at 175W vs 110W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 Nano is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 46.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 370 instead at 4,722 vs 4,609, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 370 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $500 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 346.2% (31.7 vs 7.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 Nano still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R9 370 vs Radeon R9 Nano Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 370

The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

Radeon R9 Nano

The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 370 scores 4,722 and the Radeon R9 Nano reaches 4,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 Nano uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 370) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370) vs 8.192 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Nano). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R9 370	Radeon R9 Nano
G3D Mark Score	4,722+2%	4,609
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	4096+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.496 TFLOPS	8.192 TFLOPS+228%
Boost Clock	975 MHz	1000 MHz+3%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	256+220%
L1 Cache	0.38 MB	1 MB+163%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 370	Radeon R9 Nano
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 370 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Nano carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 370 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 179 GB/s (Radeon R9 370) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Nano) — a 186% advantage for the Radeon R9 Nano. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon R9 370 and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Nano. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 370) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Nano) — the Radeon R9 Nano has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 370	Radeon R9 Nano
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	HBM
Memory Bandwidth	179 GB/s	512 GB/s+186%
Bus Width	256-bit	4096-bit+1500%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 370) vs 12 (Radeon R9 Nano). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon R9 370	Radeon R9 Nano
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 370) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Nano). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 6.0.

Feature	Radeon R9 370	Radeon R9 Nano
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 3.0
Decoder	UVD 4.0	UVD 6.0
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 370 draws 110W versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 175W — a 45.6% difference. The Radeon R9 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R9 370) vs 550W (Radeon R9 Nano). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 221mm vs 152mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Radeon R9 370	Radeon R9 Nano
TDP	110W-37%	175W
Recommended PSU	450W-18%	550W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 8-pin
Length	221mm	152mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	42.9+63%	26.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 370 came in at $149, while the Radeon R9 Nano launched at $649. On MSRP, Radeon R9 370 was 77% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 31.7 (Radeon R9 370) vs 7.1 (Radeon R9 Nano) — the Radeon R9 370 offers 346.5% better value.

Feature	Radeon R9 370	Radeon R9 Nano
MSRP	$149-77%	$649
Performance per Dollar	31.7+346%	7.1
Codename	Trinidad	Fiji
Release	May 5 2015	August 27 2015
Ranking	#456	#306

Search Radeon R9 370 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 Nano on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.