Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon R9 370

AMD

Radeon Pro 465

2016Core: 850 MHzBoost: 907 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 370

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 975 MHz

Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon R9 370 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon R9 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon R9 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 465

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 110W, a 75W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 370 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 235.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon R9 370

2015

Why buy it

  • 14.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $351 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 249.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 214.3% higher power demand at 110W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 370 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.1% in PassMark G3D (4,722 vs 4,538), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro 465 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $351 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 249.2% (31.7 vs 9.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 465 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon R9 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro 465

The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 370

The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 465 scores 4,538 and the Radeon R9 370 reaches 4,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 465 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370). Boost clocks: 907 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro 465Radeon R9 370
G3D Mark Score
4,538
4,722+4%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.858 TFLOPS
2.496 TFLOPS+34%
Boost Clock
907 MHz
975 MHz+7%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
64
80+25%
L1 Cache
256 KB
384 KB+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 465Radeon R9 370
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 465 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 370 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 370 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 465 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 370. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon Pro 465 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 465Radeon R9 370
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 465 draws 35W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 103.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 465) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon Pro 465Radeon R9 370
TDP
35W-68%
110W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
221mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
129.7+202%
42.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro 465 came in at $500, while the Radeon R9 370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R9 370 was 70.2% cheaper ($351 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.1 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 31.7 (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon R9 370 offers 248.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 465 (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon Pro 465Radeon R9 370
MSRP
$500
$149-70%
Performance per Dollar
9.1
31.7+248%
Codename
Baffin
Trinidad
Release
October 30 2016
May 5 2015
Ranking
#547
#456

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.