
Radeon Pro 465

Radeon R9 370
Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon R9 370 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon R9 370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon R9 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro 465
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 110W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 370 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌235.6% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Radeon R9 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅14.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 249.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 110W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon R9 370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 465
The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.

Radeon R9 370
The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 465 scores 4,538 and the Radeon R9 370 reaches 4,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 465 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370). Boost clocks: 907 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,538 | 4,722+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1280+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.858 TFLOPS | 2.496 TFLOPS+34% |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | 975 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 465 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 370 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 370 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 465 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 370. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon Pro 465 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 465 draws 35W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 103.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 465) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-68% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 221mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 129.7+202% | 42.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro 465 came in at $500, while the Radeon R9 370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R9 370 was 70.2% cheaper ($351 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.1 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 31.7 (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon R9 370 offers 248.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 465 (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $149-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1 | 31.7+248% |
| Codename | Baffin | Trinidad |
| Release | October 30 2016 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #547 | #456 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















