Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon R9 370
Radeon Pro 465
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro 465 is positioned at rank #152 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 465
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 465.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 465 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 370 holds the technical lead. Priced at $55 (vs $150), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 183.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 465 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+183.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($55) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 465 and Radeon R9 370
Radeon Pro 465
The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.
Radeon R9 370
The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 465 scores 4,538 and the Radeon R9 370 reaches 4,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 465 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370). Boost clocks: 907 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,538 | 4,722+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1280+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.858 TFLOPS | 2.496 TFLOPS+34% |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | 975 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 465 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 370 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 370 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon Pro 465 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 465 draws 35W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 103.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 465) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-68% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 221mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 129.7+202% | 42.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 465 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon R9 370 launched at $149 and now averages $55. The Radeon R9 370 costs 63.3% less ($95 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.3 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 85.9 (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon R9 370 offers 183.5% better value. The Radeon Pro 465 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $149-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $55-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.3 | 85.9+183% |
| Codename | Baffin | Trinidad |
| Release | October 30 2016 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #547 | #456 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 465 and Radeon R9 370
