Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon R9 Nano

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon R9 Nano FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon R9 Nano: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 465

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 27.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.1 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 175W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Nano across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 Nano

2015

Why buy it

✅67.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
29.8% HIGHER MSRP
$649 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 175W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 Nano is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 67.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (4,609 vs 4,538), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 465 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 465 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $149 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 27.8% (9.1 vs 7.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 Nano still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon Pro 465 vs Radeon R9 Nano Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 465

The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.

Radeon R9 Nano

The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 465 scores 4,538 and the Radeon R9 Nano reaches 4,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 465 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 Nano uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465) vs 8.192 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Nano). Boost clocks: 907 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon R9 Nano
G3D Mark Score	4,538	4,609+2%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024	4096+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.858 TFLOPS	8.192 TFLOPS+341%
Boost Clock	907 MHz	1000 MHz+10%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	64	256+300%
L1 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon R9 Nano
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 465 and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Nano. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Nano) — the Radeon R9 Nano has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon R9 Nano
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	HBM
Bus Width	64-bit	4096-bit+6300%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 465 draws 35W versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 175W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 465) vs 550W (Radeon R9 Nano). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin.

Feature	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon R9 Nano
TDP	35W-80%	175W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 8-pin
Length	—	152mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	129.7+393%	26.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro 465 came in at $500, while the Radeon R9 Nano launched at $649. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 465 was 23% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.1 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 7.1 (Radeon R9 Nano) — the Radeon Pro 465 offers 28.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 465 (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon R9 Nano
MSRP	$500-23%	$649
Performance per Dollar	9.1+28%	7.1
Codename	Baffin	Fiji
Release	October 30 2016	August 27 2015
Ranking	#547	#306

Search Radeon Pro 465 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 Nano on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.