GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Radeon Pro 465

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 465

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

99%

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

95%

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

83%

#137

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1627%

#152

Radeon Pro 465

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

100%

#154

Tesla P4

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190

99%

#155

Radeon Pro WX 4150

MSRP: $300|Avg: $120

97%

#158

Quadro M2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $70

95%

#159

Quadro M4000

MSRP: $791|Avg: $350

93%

#160

FirePro W4100

MSRP: $183|Avg: $183

90%

#166

FirePro W5100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

82%

#167

Radeon Pro WX 4170

MSRP: $400|Avg: $120

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro 465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID RTX6000-8Q.

Insight	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Radeon Pro 465
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon Pro 465 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 465 holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $500), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 235.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Radeon Pro 465
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+235.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)	✅More affordable ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GRID RTX6000-8Q Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 465 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID RTX6000-8Q and Radeon Pro 465

GRID RTX6000-8Q

The GRID RTX6000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,514 points.

Radeon Pro 465

The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID RTX6000-8Q scores 4,514 and the Radeon Pro 465 reaches 4,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 465 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 907 MHz.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Radeon Pro 465
G3D Mark Score	4,514	4,538
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2048+100%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+160%	1.858 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz+30%	907 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	128+100%	64
L1 Cache	768 KB+200%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Radeon Pro 465
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) — the GRID RTX6000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Radeon Pro 465
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID RTX6000-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 465's 35W — a 146.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Radeon Pro 465
TDP	225W	35W-84%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	20.1	129.7+545%

💰

Value Analysis

The GRID RTX6000-8Q launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon Pro 465 launched at $500 and now averages $150. The Radeon Pro 465 costs 70% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.0 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 30.3 (Radeon Pro 465) — the Radeon Pro 465 offers 236.7% better value. The Radeon Pro 465 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).