GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Radeon Pro 465

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Radeon Pro 465 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Radeon Pro 465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID RTX6000-8Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌542.9% higher power demand at 225W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 465

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 225W, a 190W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 465 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (4,538 vs 4,514), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID RTX6000-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 465 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 465 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID RTX6000-8Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Radeon Pro 465 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID RTX6000-8Q

The GRID RTX6000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,514 points.

Radeon Pro 465

The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID RTX6000-8Q scores 4,514 and the Radeon Pro 465 reaches 4,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 465 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 907 MHz.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Radeon Pro 465
G3D Mark Score	4,514	4,538
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2048+100%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+160%	1.858 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz+30%	907 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	128+100%	64
L1 Cache	768 KB+200%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GRID RTX6000-8Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 465 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Radeon Pro 465
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID RTX6000-8Q and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 465. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) — the GRID RTX6000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Radeon Pro 465
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID RTX6000-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 465's 35W — a 146.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Radeon Pro 465
TDP	225W	35W-84%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	20.1	129.7+545%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID RTX6000-8Q came in at $0, while the Radeon Pro 465 launched at $500. On MSRP, GRID RTX6000-8Q was 100+% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 9.1 (Radeon Pro 465) — the GRID RTX6000-8Q offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 465 (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Radeon Pro 465
MSRP	$0-100%	$500
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	9.1
Codename	GM204	Baffin
Release	August 30 2015	October 30 2016
Ranking	#505	#547

Search GRID RTX6000-8Q on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 465 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.