
GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

GRID RTX6000-8Q
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID RTX6000-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 560 (móvel).
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $500), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 896.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+896.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID RTX6000-8Q and Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

GRID RTX6000-8Q
The GRID RTX6000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,514 points.

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points. Launch price was $99.99.
Graphics Performance
The GRID RTX6000-8Q scores 4,514 and the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) reaches 4,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 2.462 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1275 MHz.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,514 | 4,500 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+96% | 2.462 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1275 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) — the GRID RTX6000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID RTX6000-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 560 (móvel)'s 65W — a 110.3% difference. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 65W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 20.1 | 69.2+244% |
Value Analysis
The GRID RTX6000-8Q launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) launched at $99 and now averages $50. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) costs 90% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.0 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 90.0 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers 900% better value. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $50-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0 | 90.0+900% |
| Codename | GM204 | Baffin |
| Release | August 30 2015 | January 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #505 | #478 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















