
GRID RTX6000-8Q

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Radeon RX 560 (móvel) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Radeon RX 560 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Radeon RX 560 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID RTX6000-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌246.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 65W.
Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅GRID RTX6000-8Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 225W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Radeon RX 560 (móvel) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID RTX6000-8Q
The GRID RTX6000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,514 points.

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points. Launch price was $99.99.
Graphics Performance
The GRID RTX6000-8Q scores 4,514 and the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) reaches 4,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 2.462 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1275 MHz.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,514 | 4,500 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+96% | 2.462 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1275 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GRID RTX6000-8Q does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GRID RTX6000-8Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID RTX6000-8Q and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560 (móvel). L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) — the GRID RTX6000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID RTX6000-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 560 (móvel)'s 65W — a 110.3% difference. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 65W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 20.1 | 69.2+244% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID RTX6000-8Q came in at $0, while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) launched at $99. On MSRP, GRID RTX6000-8Q was 100+% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 45.5 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) — the GRID RTX6000-8Q offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 560 (móvel) (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $99 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 45.5 |
| Codename | GM204 | Baffin |
| Release | August 30 2015 | January 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #505 | #478 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















