
FirePro S10000 vs GRID RTX6000-8Q

FirePro S10000
Popular choices:

GRID RTX6000-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro S10000 is positioned at rank #336 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S10000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro S10000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID RTX6000-8Q.
| Insight | FirePro S10000 | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (305mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro S10000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro S10000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $500 (vs $500), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro S10000 | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S10000 and GRID RTX6000-8Q

FirePro S10000
The FirePro S10000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,537 points. Launch price was $3,599.

GRID RTX6000-8Q
The GRID RTX6000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,514 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S10000 scores 4,537 and the GRID RTX6000-8Q reaches 4,514 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S10000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID RTX6000-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (FirePro S10000) vs 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-8Q). Raw compute: 3.405 TFLOPS ×2 (FirePro S10000) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-8Q). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,537 | 4,514 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+100% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.405 TFLOPS ×2 | 4.825 TFLOPS+42% |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1178 MHz+24% |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 112 ×2 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 768 KB+71% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S10000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID RTX6000-8Q has 2 GB. The FirePro S10000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S10000) vs 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-8Q) — the GRID RTX6000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S10000) vs 12_2 (GRID RTX6000-8Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S10000) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GRID RTX6000-8Q). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S10000 draws 375W versus the GRID RTX6000-8Q's 225W — a 50% difference. The GRID RTX6000-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S10000) vs 350W (GRID RTX6000-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 305mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 225W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 305mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.1 | 20.1+66% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S10000 launched at $3599 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GRID RTX6000-8Q launched at $0 and now averages $500. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.1 (FirePro S10000) vs 9.0 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) — the FirePro S10000 offers 1.1% better value. The GRID RTX6000-8Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | GRID RTX6000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3599 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1+1% | 9.0 |
| Codename | Tahiti | GM204 |
| Release | November 12 2012 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #461 | #505 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















