FirePro S10000 vs GRID T4-8Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S10000 vs GRID T4-8Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro S10000 vs GRID T4-8Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S10000

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
44% HIGHER MSRP
$3,599 MSRPvs$2,500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($3,599 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
❌275% higher power demand at 375W vs 100W.

GRID T4-8Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,099 less on MSRP ($2,500 MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 375W, a 275W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID T4-8Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5% in PassMark G3D (4,762 vs 4,537), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro S10000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID T4-8Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,099 cheaper on MSRP at $2,500 vs $3,599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 51.1% (1.9 vs 1.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID T4-8Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro S10000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro S10000 vs GRID T4-8Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro S10000

The FirePro S10000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,537 points. Launch price was $3,599.

GRID T4-8Q

The GRID T4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,762 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro S10000 scores 4,537 versus the GRID T4-8Q's 4,762 — the GRID T4-8Q leads by 5%. The FirePro S10000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID T4-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (FirePro S10000) vs 1,536 (GRID T4-8Q). Raw compute: 3.405 TFLOPS ×2 (FirePro S10000) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID T4-8Q).

Feature	FirePro S10000	GRID T4-8Q
G3D Mark Score	4,537	4,762+5%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4096 ×2+167%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.405 TFLOPS ×2+54%	2.218 TFLOPS
ROPs	32 ×2	64+100%
TMUs	112 ×2+17%	96
L1 Cache	448 KB	576 KB+29%
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	2 MB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro S10000	GRID T4-8Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S10000 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID T4-8Q carries 2 GB. FirePro S10000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S10000 and 64-bit on the GRID T4-8Q. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S10000) vs 2 MB (GRID T4-8Q) — the GRID T4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro S10000	GRID T4-8Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	2 MB+167%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S10000 draws 375W versus the GRID T4-8Q's 100W — a 115.8% difference. The GRID T4-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S10000) vs 350W (GRID T4-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro S10000	GRID T4-8Q
TDP	375W	100W-73%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	305mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	12.1	47.6+293%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S10000 came in at $3599, while the GRID T4-8Q launched at $2500. On MSRP, GRID T4-8Q was 30.5% cheaper ($1099 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (FirePro S10000) vs 1.9 (GRID T4-8Q) — the GRID T4-8Q offers 46.2% better value. The newer card here is GRID T4-8Q (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro S10000	GRID T4-8Q
MSRP	$3599	$2500-31%
Performance per Dollar	1.3	1.9+46%
Codename	Tahiti	GM204
Release	November 12 2012	August 30 2015
Ranking	#461	#535

Search FirePro S10000 on Amazon

Search GRID T4-8Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.