Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro S10000 vs Radeon R9 370

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro S10000

2012Core: 825 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 370

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 975 MHz
Buy on Amazon

FirePro S10000 vs Radeon R9 370 Performance Spectrum

FirePro S10000
4 GB 375
4,537
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 6850 X2
brand logoRadeon R9 360
brand logoRadeon RX 550 (móvel)
brand logoRadeon HD 7800-serie
brand logoRadeon RX 580
brand logoRadeon RX 6600S
brand logoRadeon RX 7600 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6800
Radeon R9 370
4 GB 110
4,722
+4.1%
brand logoRadeon HD 8770
brand logoRadeon R7 360
brand logoRadeon RX 560
brand logoRadeon RX 460 (móvel)
brand logoRadeon RX 5500 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6800M
brand logoRadeon RX 6850M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6800

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S10000 vs Radeon R9 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S10000

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    2315.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,599 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($3,599 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ❌240.9% higher power demand at 375W vs 110W.
  • ❌38% longer card at 305mm vs 221mm.

Radeon R9 370

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $3,450 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 2413.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 110W instead of 375W, a 265W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 221mm instead of 305mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 370 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.1% in PassMark G3D (4,722 vs 4,537), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro S10000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,450 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $3,599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2413.9% (31.7 vs 1.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro S10000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro S10000 vs Radeon R9 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro S10000

The FirePro S10000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,537 points. Launch price was $3,599.

AMD

Radeon R9 370

The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S10000 scores 4,537 and the Radeon R9 370 reaches 4,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S10000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (FirePro S10000) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Raw compute: 3.405 TFLOPS ×2 (FirePro S10000) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureFirePro S10000Radeon R9 370
G3D Mark Score
4,537
4,722+4%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4096 ×2+220%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.405 TFLOPS ×2+36%
2.496 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
950 MHz
975 MHz+3%
ROPs
32 ×2
32
TMUs
112 ×2+40%
80
L1 Cache
448 KB+17%
384 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S10000Radeon R9 370
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S10000 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 370. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro S10000) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 370) — the FirePro S10000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S10000Radeon R9 370
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S10000) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 370). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro S10000Radeon R9 370
DirectX
12
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S10000) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 370). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S10000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC (Radeon R9 370).

FeatureFirePro S10000Radeon R9 370
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 3.2
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S10000 draws 375W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 109.3% difference. The Radeon R9 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S10000) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 305mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.

FeatureFirePro S10000Radeon R9 370
TDP
375W
110W-71%
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
305mm
221mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
75-12%
Perf/Watt
12.1
42.9+255%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S10000 came in at $3599, while the Radeon R9 370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R9 370 was 95.9% cheaper ($3450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (FirePro S10000) vs 31.7 (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon R9 370 offers 2338.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 370 (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro S10000Radeon R9 370
MSRP
$3599
$149-96%
Performance per Dollar
1.3
31.7+2338%
Codename
Tahiti
Trinidad
Release
November 12 2012
May 5 2015
Ranking
#461
#456
Search FirePro S10000 on AmazonSearch Radeon R9 370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.