Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Radeon R9 Nano

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GRID RTX6000-8Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 Nano

2015Boost: 1000 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Radeon R9 Nano Performance Spectrum

GRID RTX6000-8Q
2 GB 225
4,514
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 650 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 960A
brand logoGeForce GTX 965M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX TITAN Z
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Radeon R9 Nano
2 GB 175
4,609
+2.1%
brand logoRadeon HD 6850 X2
brand logoRadeon R9 260
brand logoRadeon RX 550 (móvel)
brand logoRadeon RX 460 (móvel)
brand logoRadeon RX 5500
brand logoRadeon RX 6800M
brand logoRadeon RX 6850M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6800

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Radeon R9 Nano: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID RTX6000-8Q

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • ❌28.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 175W.
  • ❌75.7% longer card at 267mm vs 152mm.

Radeon R9 Nano

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 175W instead of 225W, a 50W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 152mm instead of 267mm, a 115mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 Nano is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (4,609 vs 4,514), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID RTX6000-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 Nano makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 Nano is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID RTX6000-8Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Radeon R9 Nano Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID RTX6000-8Q

The GRID RTX6000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,514 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 Nano

The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID RTX6000-8Q scores 4,514 and the Radeon R9 Nano reaches 4,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 Nano uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 8.192 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Nano). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-8QRadeon R9 Nano
G3D Mark Score
4,514
4,609+2%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
4096+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS+70%
Boost Clock
1178 MHz+18%
1000 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
128
256+100%
L1 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GRID RTX6000-8Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 Nano leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-8QRadeon R9 Nano
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID RTX6000-8Q and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Nano.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-8QRadeon R9 Nano
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
HBM
Bus Width
64-bit
4096-bit+6300%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_2 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 12 (Radeon R9 Nano). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-8QRadeon R9 Nano
DirectX
12_2
12
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Nano). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs UVD 6.0.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-8QRadeon R9 Nano
Encoder
NVENC 7th Gen
VCE 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th Gen
UVD 6.0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID RTX6000-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 175W — a 25% difference. The Radeon R9 Nano is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 550W (Radeon R9 Nano). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 152mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-8QRadeon R9 Nano
TDP
225W
175W-22%
Recommended PSU
350W-36%
550W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 8-pin
Length
267mm
152mm
Slots
2
2
Perf/Watt
20.1
26.3+31%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID RTX6000-8Q came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 Nano launched at $649. On MSRP, GRID RTX6000-8Q was 100+% cheaper ($649 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 7.1 (Radeon R9 Nano) — the GRID RTX6000-8Q offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-8QRadeon R9 Nano
MSRP
$0-100%
$649
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
7.1
Codename
GM204
Fiji
Release
August 30 2015
August 27 2015
Ranking
#505
#306
Search GRID RTX6000-8Q on AmazonSearch Radeon R9 Nano on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.