GeForce GTX 580 vs Radeon Pro 465
GeForce GTX 580
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 465
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 465
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 465 is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The Radeon Pro 465 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 465.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 580 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 580 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $150), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 410.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+410.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 580 and Radeon Pro 465
GeForce GTX 580
The GeForce GTX 580 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 9 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 772 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 244W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,634 points. Launch price was $499.
Radeon Pro 465
The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 580 scores 4,634 and the Radeon Pro 465 reaches 4,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 580 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 465 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 580) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465). Raw compute: 1.581 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 580) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,634+2% | 4,538 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1024+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.581 TFLOPS | 1.858 TFLOPS+18% |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 580 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 465 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 580 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 580) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) — the Radeon Pro 465 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+500% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 580 draws 244W versus the Radeon Pro 465's 35W — a 149.8% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 580) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 465). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 244W | 35W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 19.0 | 129.7+583% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 580 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon Pro 465 launched at $500 and now averages $150. The GeForce GTX 580 costs 80% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 154.5 (GeForce GTX 580) vs 30.3 (Radeon Pro 465) — the GeForce GTX 580 offers 409.9% better value. The Radeon Pro 465 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 580 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-80% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 154.5+410% | 30.3 |
| Codename | GF110 | Baffin |
| Release | November 9 2010 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #458 | #547 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 580 and Radeon Pro 465
