GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs Radeon Pro 465

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs Radeon Pro 465 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs Radeon Pro 465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

2019

Why buy it

✅Radeon Pro 465 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 465 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 465

2016

Why buy it

✅5.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 465 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB instead at 4,800 vs 4,538, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 465 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 465 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs Radeon Pro 465 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1366 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

Radeon Pro 465

The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB scores 4,800 versus the Radeon Pro 465's 4,538 — the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB leads by 5.8%. The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 465 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465). Raw compute: 2.215 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 907 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB	Radeon Pro 465
G3D Mark Score	4,800+6%	4,538
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	768	1024+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.215 TFLOPS+19%	1.858 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1442 MHz+59%	907 MHz
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	48	64+33%
L1 Cache	288 KB+13%	256 KB
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 465 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB	Radeon Pro 465
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 465. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) — the Radeon Pro 465 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB	Radeon Pro 465
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	96-bit+50%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1 MB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 465's 35W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB	Radeon Pro 465
TDP	75W	35W-53%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	64.0	129.7+103%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB (2019 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB	Radeon Pro 465
MSRP	—	$500
Codename	GP107	Baffin
Release	February 1 2019	October 30 2016
Ranking	#453	#547

Search GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 465 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.