
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

Radeon Pro Vega 16
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs Radeon Pro Vega 16 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs Radeon Pro Vega 16 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs Radeon Pro Vega 16: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
2019Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Pro Vega 16 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 16 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Radeon Pro Vega 16
2018Why buy it
- ✅23.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs Radeon Pro Vega 16 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1366 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 16
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB scores 4,800 and the Radeon Pro Vega 16 reaches 4,809 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Raw compute: 2.215 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 2.437 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,800 | 4,809 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1024+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.215 TFLOPS | 2.437 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz+21% | 1190 MHz |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 48 | 64+33% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB+13% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 16. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 16) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro Vega 16).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 16's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 64.0 | 64.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GP107 | Vega 12 |
| Release | February 1 2019 | November 14 2018 |
| Ranking | #453 | #451 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














