
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 16
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is positioned at rank #31 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro Vega 16 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB and Radeon Pro Vega 16

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1366 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 16
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB scores 4,800 and the Radeon Pro Vega 16 reaches 4,809 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Raw compute: 2.215 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 2.437 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,800 | 4,809 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1024+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.215 TFLOPS | 2.437 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz+21% | 1190 MHz |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 48 | 64+33% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB+13% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 16) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro Vega 16).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 16's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 64.0 | 64.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $0 |
| Codename | GP107 | Vega 12 |
| Release | February 1 2019 | November 14 2018 |
| Ranking | #453 | #451 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












