GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
GeForce GTX 760 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 760 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 760 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 760
2013Why buy it
- ✅17.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
2019Why buy it
- ✅GeForce GTX 760 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 19.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 760 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 760
The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1366 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 scores 4,813 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760) vs 2.215 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1442 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,813 | 4,800 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+50% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.378 TFLOPS+7% | 2.215 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 1442 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 96+100% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 288 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 760 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760) vs 84 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) — a 128.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 and 96-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 760) vs 768 KB (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+129% | 84 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+167% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6+7% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 760) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 760) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 draws 170W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB's 75W — a 77.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 75W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 28.3 | 64.0+126% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GK104 | GP107 |
| Release | June 25 2013 | February 1 2019 |
| Ranking | #450 | #453 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 760 and GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
