
GeForce GTX 760 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce GTX 760
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 760 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 760 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 and GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce GTX 760
The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1366 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 scores 4,813 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760) vs 2.215 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1442 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,813 | 4,800 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+50% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.378 TFLOPS+7% | 2.215 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 1442 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 96+100% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 288 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 760 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760) vs 84 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) — a 128.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760. Bus width: 256-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 760) vs 768 KB (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+129% | 84 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+167% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6+7% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 760) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 760) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 draws 170W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB's 75W — a 77.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 75W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 28.3 | 64.0+126% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Codename | GK104 | GP107 |
| Release | June 25 2013 | February 1 2019 |
| Ranking | #450 | #453 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















