G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 vs GeForce GTX 1630 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760 vs GeForce GTX 1630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760

2013

Why buy it

✅1.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
66% HIGHER MSRP
$249 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.
❌66.2% longer card at 241mm vs 145mm.

GeForce GTX 1630

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 72.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 19.3 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅GeForce GTX 760 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1630 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
✅Measures 145mm instead of 241mm, a 96mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 760 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1630 instead at 4,992 vs 4,813, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1630 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1630 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $99 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 72.2% (33.3 vs 19.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX 760 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 760 vs GeForce GTX 1630 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760

The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.

GeForce GTX 1630

The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 scores 4,813 and the GeForce GTX 1630 reaches 4,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1630 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 1630). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760) vs 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1630). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1785 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce GTX 1630
G3D Mark Score	4,813	4,992+4%
Architecture	Kepler	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1152+125%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.378 TFLOPS+30%	1.828 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	1785 MHz+73%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	96+200%	32
L1 Cache	96 KB	512 KB+433%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce GTX 1630
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760) vs 96 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1630) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 and 64-bit on the GeForce GTX 1630. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1630) — the GeForce GTX 1630 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce GTX 1630
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s+100%	96 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 1630). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce GTX 1630
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.3	4.6+7%
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 760) vs NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1630). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 760) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1630).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce GTX 1630
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	NVENC 6th gen
Decoder	NVDEC 1st gen	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 draws 170W versus the GeForce GTX 1630's 75W — a 77.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1630). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 60°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce GTX 1630
TDP	170W	75W-56%
Recommended PSU	500W	300W-40%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	None
Length	241mm	145mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	60°C-25%
Perf/Watt	28.3	66.6+135%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760 came in at $249, while the GeForce GTX 1630 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1630 was 39.8% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 19.3 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 33.3 (GeForce GTX 1630) — the GeForce GTX 1630 offers 72.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1630 (2022 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce GTX 1630
MSRP	$249	$150-40%
Performance per Dollar	19.3	33.3+73%
Codename	GK104	TU117
Release	June 25 2013	June 28 2022
Ranking	#450	#444

Search GeForce GTX 760 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1630 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.