GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon R9 M395

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 760

2013Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Radeon R9 M395

2015Core: 834 MHz

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon R9 M395 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 760

4 GB 170

4,813

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Radeon R9 M395

2 GB 75

4,934

+2.5%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon R9 M395 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon R9 M395: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760

2013

Why buy it

✅2.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M395

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
20.5% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 19.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 760 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M395 instead at 4,934 vs 4,813, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 760 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 760 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 17.5% (19.3 vs 16.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon R9 M395 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760

The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon R9 M395

The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 scores 4,813 and the Radeon R9 M395 reaches 4,934 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M395 uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	Radeon R9 M395
G3D Mark Score	4,813	4,934+3%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1152	1792+56%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M395 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	Radeon R9 M395
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 760 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395) — a 9.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	Radeon R9 M395
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s+9%	176 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760) vs 12 (FL12_0) (Radeon R9 M395). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	Radeon R9 M395
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (FL12_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.3	4.6+7%
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 760) vs UVD (Radeon R9 M395). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 760) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M395).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	Radeon R9 M395
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	UVD
Decoder	NVDEC 1st gen	VCE
Codecs	H.264	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 draws 170W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 77.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M395 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	Radeon R9 M395
TDP	170W	75W-56%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	Mobile
Length	241mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	28.3	65.8+133%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760 came in at $249, while the Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 760 was 17% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 19.3 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) — the GeForce GTX 760 offers 17.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M395 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	Radeon R9 M395
MSRP	$249-17%	$300
Performance per Dollar	19.3+18%	16.4
Codename	GK104	—
Release	June 25 2013	June 9 2015
Ranking	#450	#445

Search GeForce GTX 760 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M395 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.