GeForce GTX 760
Radeon Pro Vega 16
GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 760
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Pro Vega 16 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 760 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 16 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.
Radeon Pro Vega 16
2018Why buy it
- ✅5.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 19.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 760
The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.
Radeon Pro Vega 16
The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 scores 4,813 and the Radeon Pro Vega 16 reaches 4,809 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760) vs 2.437 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,813 | 4,809 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+13% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.378 TFLOPS | 2.437 TFLOPS+2% |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 1190 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 256 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 760 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 760 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 16. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 16) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6+7% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 760) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 760) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro Vega 16).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 draws 170W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 16's 75W — a 77.6% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 75W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 28.3 | 64.1+127% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 760 came in at $249, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 16 was 100+% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 19.3 (GeForce GTX 760) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 16) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro Vega 16 (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK104 | Vega 12 |
| Release | June 25 2013 | November 14 2018 |
| Ranking | #450 | #451 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 760 and Radeon Pro Vega 16
