GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs GeForce GTX 760

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs GeForce GTX 760 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs GeForce GTX 760: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Why buy it

✅GeForce GTX 760 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 460 768MB is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
✅Measures 210mm instead of 241mm, a 31mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 19.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 760

2013

Why buy it

✅5.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.
❌14.8% longer card at 241mm vs 210mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 760 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (4,813 vs 4,800), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 460 768MB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 760 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 760 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 460 768MB has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs GeForce GTX 760 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

GeForce GTX 760

The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB scores 4,800 and the GeForce GTX 760 reaches 4,813 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 760 uses Kepler. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	GeForce GTX 760
G3D Mark Score	4,800	4,813
Architecture	Fermi	Kepler
Shading Units	336	1152+243%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	GeForce GTX 760
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 760 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760) — a 122.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 768MB and 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	GeForce GTX 760
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	192 GB/s+122%
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	GeForce GTX 760
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6+7%	4.3
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 760). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 760).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	GeForce GTX 760
Encoder	PureVideo HD VP4	NVENC 1st gen
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	NVDEC 1st gen
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 760's 170W — a 77.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 210mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	GeForce GTX 760
TDP	75W-56%	170W
Recommended PSU	450W-10%	500W
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	2x 6-pin
Length	210mm	241mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	64.0+126%	28.3