FirePro S9050 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S9050 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro S9050 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S9050

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
❌21% longer card at 254mm vs 210mm.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Why buy it

✅FirePro S9050 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 460 768MB is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
✅Measures 210mm instead of 254mm, a 44mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro S9050 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (4,901 vs 4,800), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 460 768MB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro S9050 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro S9050 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 460 768MB has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro S9050 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro S9050

The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 and the GeForce GTX 460 768MB reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 460 768MB uses Fermi. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB).

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
G3D Mark Score	4,901+2%	4,800
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Shading Units	1792+433%	336

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro S9050 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S9050 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 768MB carries 2 GB. FirePro S9050 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S9050 and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 768MB.

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	192-bit+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S9050) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S9050) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 768MB).

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Encoder	VCE 1.0	PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder	UVD 3.2	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 460 768MB's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 254mm vs 210mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 70°C.

Feature	FirePro S9050	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
TDP	225W	75W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	254mm	210mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	90°C	70°C-22%
Perf/Watt	21.8	64.0+194%