CMP 30HX vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
CMP 30HX
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The CMP 30HX is positioned at rank #190 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar CMP 30HX
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The CMP 30HX is significantly newer (2021 vs 0). The CMP 30HX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The CMP 30HX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
| Insight | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Fermi (2010−2014) (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the CMP 30HX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and GeForce GTX 460 768MB
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the GeForce GTX 460 768MB reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 460 768MB uses Fermi. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892+2% | 4,800 |
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Shading Units | 1408+319% | 336 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Decoder: No vs PureVideo HD VP4.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | No | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the GeForce GTX 460 768MB's 75W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 210mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 75W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 210mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 64.0+64% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on CMP 30HX and GeForce GTX 460 768MB
