
GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Radeon R9 270X
GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon R9 270X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon R9 270X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon R9 270X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Why buy it
- ✅Radeon R9 270X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 460 768MB is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Measures 210mm instead of 241mm, a 31mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 270X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon R9 270X
2013Why buy it
- ✅16.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
- ❌14.8% longer card at 241mm vs 210mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon R9 270X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB
The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

Radeon R9 270X
The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 460 768MB scores 4,800 and the Radeon R9 270X reaches 4,874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 270X uses GCN 1.0. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,800 | 4,874+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Shading Units | 336 | 1280+281% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 460 768MB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 270X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 460 768MB has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 270X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270X) — a 107.4% advantage for the Radeon R9 270X. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 768MB and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270X.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s+107% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 270X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 460 768MB draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 270X's 180W — a 82.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270X). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 210mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80 C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-58% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 210mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80 C |
| Perf/Watt | 64.0+136% | 27.1 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













