
GeForce GTX 760 vs RTXA5000-24Q

GeForce GTX 760
Popular choices:

RTXA5000-24Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-24Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTXA5000-24Q is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The RTXA5000-24Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 760 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTXA5000-24Q.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760 | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 760 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $2,100 for the RTXA5000-24Q, it costs 99% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 6914.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760 | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+6914.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 and RTXA5000-24Q

GeForce GTX 760
The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.

RTXA5000-24Q
The RTXA5000-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 scores 4,813 and the RTXA5000-24Q reaches 4,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 is built on Kepler while the RTXA5000-24Q uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-24Q). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-24Q). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,813 | 4,803 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152 | 8192+611% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.378 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+1068% |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 1695 MHz+64% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 96 | 256+167% |
| L1 Cache | 0.09 MB | 8 MB+8789% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-24Q has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 760 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-24Q) — the RTXA5000-24Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 draws 170W versus the RTXA5000-24Q's 230W — a 30% difference. The GeForce GTX 760 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760) vs 350W (RTXA5000-24Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-26% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.3+35% | 20.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 760 launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the RTXA5000-24Q launched at $3721 and now averages $2100. The GeForce GTX 760 costs 98.6% less ($2070 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 160.4 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 2.3 (RTXA5000-24Q) — the GeForce GTX 760 offers 6873.9% better value. The RTXA5000-24Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-93% | $3721 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-99% | $2100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 160.4+6874% | 2.3 |
| Codename | GK104 | GA102 |
| Release | June 25 2013 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #450 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















