
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs RTXA5000-8Q

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
Popular choices:

RTXA5000-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is positioned at rank 31 and the RTXA5000-8Q is on rank 295, so the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTXA5000-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTXA5000-8Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB and RTXA5000-8Q

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1366 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

RTXA5000-8Q
The RTXA5000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,916 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB scores 4,800 and the RTXA5000-8Q reaches 4,916 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is built on Pascal while the RTXA5000-8Q uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-8Q). Raw compute: 2.215 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-8Q). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,800 | 4,916+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 8192+967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.215 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+1154% |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz | 1695 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 24 | 96+300% |
| TMUs | 48 | 256+433% |
| L1 Cache | 0.28 MB | 8 MB+2757% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 6 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-8Q) — the RTXA5000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 6 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB draws 75W versus the RTXA5000-8Q's 230W — a 101.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 350W (RTXA5000-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 64.0+199% | 21.4 |
Value Analysis
The RTXA5000-8Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | RTXA5000-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $2500 |
| Codename | GP107 | GA102 |
| Release | February 1 2019 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #453 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















