GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
VS
T550 Mobile

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs T550 Mobile

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

2019Core: 1366 MHzBoost: 1442 MHz
VS

T550 Mobile

2022Core: 1065 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is positioned at rank 31 and the T550 Mobile is on rank 45, so the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

#21
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
158%
#23
144%
#24
143%
#28
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
130%
#29
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
129%
#31
100%
#35
GeForce GTX 960M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
98%
#37
97%
#46
Radeon RX 5500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar T550 Mobile

#16
Radeon RX 7600S
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
97%
#35
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
182%
#37
165%
#38
165%
#42
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
150%
#43
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
149%
#45
T550 Mobile
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#46
Radeon RX 5500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
100%
#48
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
99%
#49
GeForce 610M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
98%
#50
GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $75
98%
#53
GeForce GTX 980M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
95%
#54
GeForce GTX 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
94%
#58
GeForce 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T550 Mobile.

InsightGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GBT550 Mobile
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Longevity
Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB and T550 Mobile

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1366 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

T550 Mobile

The T550 Mobile is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,764 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB scores 4,800 and the T550 Mobile reaches 4,764 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is built on Pascal while the T550 Mobile uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 1,024 (T550 Mobile). Raw compute: 2.215 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 3.41 TFLOPS (T550 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GBT550 Mobile
G3D Mark Score
4,800
4,764
Architecture
Pascal
Turing
Process Node
14 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
768
1024+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.215 TFLOPS
3.41 TFLOPS+54%
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
1665 MHz+15%
ROPs
24
32+33%
TMUs
48
64+33%
L1 Cache
0.28 MB
1 MB+257%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GBT550 Mobile
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 1 MB (T550 Mobile) — the T550 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GBT550 Mobile
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
96-bit
128-bit+33%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB draws 75W versus the T550 Mobile's 23W — a 106.1% difference. The T550 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 350W (T550 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GBT550 Mobile
TDP
75W
23W-69%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
64.0
207.1+224%