G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro 465

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 560X (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
809.1% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

2018

Why buy it

✅10.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $445 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 861.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 465: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 465 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 465

2016

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Why buy it

✅10.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $445 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 861.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 465: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 465 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 560X (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
809.1% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 560X (móvel) better than Radeon Pro 465?

Yes. Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 10.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 5.8% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2018 instead of 2016, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016 and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is about $445 cheaper on MSRP at $55 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 10.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 5.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 861.6%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro 465 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro 465 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $500 MSRP, even if Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro 465 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 560X (móvel) Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
1080p
low	36 FPS	41 FPS
medium	22 FPS	27 FPS
high	15 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	8 FPS	13 FPS
1440p
low	24 FPS	29 FPS
medium	14 FPS	18 FPS
high	8 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	4 FPS	7 FPS
4K
low	9 FPS	14 FPS
medium	6 FPS	9 FPS
high	4 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	3 FPS	4 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 465 Open Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
1080p
low	73 FPS	83 FPS
medium	45 FPS	54 FPS
high	32 FPS	41 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	23 FPS
1440p
low	35 FPS	40 FPS
medium	23 FPS	29 FPS
high	16 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	14 FPS
4K
low	10 FPS	10 FPS
medium	7 FPS	8 FPS
high	6 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	4 FPS	5 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 465 Open Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
1080p
low	204 FPS	216 FPS
medium	163 FPS	173 FPS
high	136 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	162 FPS
medium	123 FPS	130 FPS
high	102 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	102 FPS	108 FPS
medium	82 FPS	86 FPS
high	68 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	52 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 465 Open Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
1080p
low	138 FPS	183 FPS
medium	107 FPS	143 FPS
high	87 FPS	116 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	100 FPS	143 FPS
medium	79 FPS	111 FPS
high	66 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	59 FPS	77 FPS
medium	45 FPS	57 FPS
high	35 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	36 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 465 Open Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 465 and Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

Radeon Pro 465

The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1275 MHz to 1202 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro 465 scores 4,538 versus the Radeon RX 560X (móvel)'s 4,800 — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) leads by 5.8%. The Radeon Pro 465 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Boost clocks: 907 MHz vs 1202 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	4,538	4,800+6%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1024	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.858 TFLOPS	2.611 TFLOPS+41%
Boost Clock	907 MHz	1202 MHz+33%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64	64
L1 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 465 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 465 draws 35W versus the Radeon RX 560X (móvel)'s 65W — a 60% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 465) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon Pro 465	Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
TDP	35W-46%	65W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	129.7+76%	73.8

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro 465 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) launched at $55. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) costs 89% less ($445 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.1 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 87.3 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) offers 859.3% better value. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).