GRID T4-8Q vs Radeon R9 370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID T4-8Q vs Radeon R9 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID T4-8Q vs Radeon R9 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID T4-8Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1577.9% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon R9 370

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,351 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1563.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID T4-8Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (4,762 vs 4,722), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID T4-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,351 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1563.8% (31.7 vs 1.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID T4-8Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID T4-8Q vs Radeon R9 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID T4-8Q

The GRID T4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,762 points.

Radeon R9 370

The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID T4-8Q scores 4,762 and the Radeon R9 370 reaches 4,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID T4-8Q) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID T4-8Q) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370).

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	Radeon R9 370
G3D Mark Score	4,762	4,722
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+20%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.218 TFLOPS	2.496 TFLOPS+13%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	96+20%	80
L1 Cache	576 KB+50%	384 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	Radeon R9 370
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID T4-8Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 370 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 370 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID T4-8Q and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 370. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID T4-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 370) — the GRID T4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	Radeon R9 370
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID T4-8Q draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 9.5% difference. The GRID T4-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-8Q) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	Radeon R9 370
TDP	100W-9%	110W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	221mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	47.6+11%	42.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID T4-8Q came in at $2500, while the Radeon R9 370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R9 370 was 94% cheaper ($2351 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GRID T4-8Q) vs 31.7 (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon R9 370 offers 1568.4% better value.

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	Radeon R9 370
MSRP	$2500	$149-94%
Performance per Dollar	1.9	31.7+1568%
Codename	GM204	Trinidad
Release	August 30 2015	May 5 2015
Ranking	#535	#456

Search GRID T4-8Q on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.