GRID T4-8Q vs Radeon R9 Nano

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID T4-8Q vs Radeon R9 Nano FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID T4-8Q vs Radeon R9 Nano: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID T4-8Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 175W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
285.2% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).

Radeon R9 Nano

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 272.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌75% higher power demand at 175W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID T4-8Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (4,762 vs 4,609), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID T4-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 Nano makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,851 cheaper on MSRP at $649 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 272.8% (7.1 vs 1.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 Nano is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID T4-8Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID T4-8Q vs Radeon R9 Nano Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID T4-8Q

The GRID T4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,762 points.

Radeon R9 Nano

The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID T4-8Q scores 4,762 and the Radeon R9 Nano reaches 4,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 Nano uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID T4-8Q) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID T4-8Q) vs 8.192 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Nano).

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	Radeon R9 Nano
G3D Mark Score	4,762+3%	4,609
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536	4096+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.218 TFLOPS	8.192 TFLOPS+269%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	96	256+167%
L1 Cache	0.56 MB	1 MB+79%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	Radeon R9 Nano
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID T4-8Q and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Nano.

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	Radeon R9 Nano
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	HBM
Bus Width	64-bit	4096-bit+6300%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID T4-8Q draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 175W — a 54.5% difference. The GRID T4-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-8Q) vs 550W (Radeon R9 Nano). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin.

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	Radeon R9 Nano
TDP	100W-43%	175W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 8-pin
Length	—	152mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	47.6+81%	26.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID T4-8Q came in at $2500, while the Radeon R9 Nano launched at $649. On MSRP, Radeon R9 Nano was 74% cheaper ($1851 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GRID T4-8Q) vs 7.1 (Radeon R9 Nano) — the Radeon R9 Nano offers 273.7% better value.

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	Radeon R9 Nano
MSRP	$2500	$649-74%
Performance per Dollar	1.9	7.1+274%
Codename	GM204	Fiji
Release	August 30 2015	August 27 2015
Ranking	#535	#306

Search GRID T4-8Q on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 Nano on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.