
GRID T4-8Q vs GeForce GTX 760

GRID T4-8Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 760
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID T4-8Q is positioned at rank #302 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID T4-8Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 760 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID T4-8Q.
| Insight | GRID T4-8Q | GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 760 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 760 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $1,000), it costs 97% less, resulting in a 3269% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID T4-8Q | GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3269%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID T4-8Q and GeForce GTX 760

GRID T4-8Q
The GRID T4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,762 points.

GeForce GTX 760
The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GRID T4-8Q scores 4,762 and the GeForce GTX 760 reaches 4,813 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 760 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID T4-8Q) vs 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID T4-8Q) vs 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760).
| Feature | GRID T4-8Q | GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,762 | 4,813+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+33% | 1152 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.218 TFLOPS | 2.378 TFLOPS+7% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+500% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID T4-8Q | GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID T4-8Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 760 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID T4-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760) — the GRID T4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID T4-8Q | GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID T4-8Q draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 760's 170W — a 51.9% difference. The GRID T4-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-8Q) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GRID T4-8Q | GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-41% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 47.6+68% | 28.3 |
Value Analysis
The GRID T4-8Q launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $1000, while the GeForce GTX 760 launched at $249 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 760 costs 97% less ($970 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.8 (GRID T4-8Q) vs 160.4 (GeForce GTX 760) — the GeForce GTX 760 offers 3241.7% better value. The GRID T4-8Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID T4-8Q | GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $249-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1000 | $30-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.8 | 160.4+3242% |
| Codename | GM204 | GK104 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | June 25 2013 |
| Ranking | #535 | #450 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















