GRID T4-8Q vs Radeon Sky 500

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID T4-8Q vs Radeon Sky 500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID T4-8Q vs Radeon Sky 500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID T4-8Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
400% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Radeon Sky 500

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 395.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID T4-8Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (4,762 vs 4,723), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID T4-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Sky 500 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,000 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 395.9% (9.4 vs 1.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Sky 500 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID T4-8Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID T4-8Q vs Radeon Sky 500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID T4-8Q

The GRID T4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,762 points.

Radeon Sky 500

The Radeon Sky 500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,723 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID T4-8Q scores 4,762 and the Radeon Sky 500 reaches 4,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Sky 500 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID T4-8Q) vs 1,280 (Radeon Sky 500). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID T4-8Q) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (Radeon Sky 500).

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	Radeon Sky 500
G3D Mark Score	4,762	4,723
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+20%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.218 TFLOPS	2.432 TFLOPS+10%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	96+20%	80
L1 Cache	576 KB+80%	320 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	Radeon Sky 500
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID T4-8Q and 64-bit on the Radeon Sky 500. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID T4-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Sky 500) — the GRID T4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	Radeon Sky 500
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID T4-8Q draws 100W versus the Radeon Sky 500's 150W — a 40% difference. The GRID T4-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon Sky 500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	Radeon Sky 500
TDP	100W-33%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	47.6+51%	31.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID T4-8Q came in at $2500, while the Radeon Sky 500 launched at $500. On MSRP, Radeon Sky 500 was 80% cheaper ($2000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GRID T4-8Q) vs 9.4 (Radeon Sky 500) — the Radeon Sky 500 offers 394.7% better value. The newer card here is GRID T4-8Q (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	Radeon Sky 500
MSRP	$2500	$500-80%
Performance per Dollar	1.9	9.4+395%
Codename	GM204	Pitcairn
Release	August 30 2015	March 27 2013
Ranking	#535	#455

Search GRID T4-8Q on Amazon

Search Radeon Sky 500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.