GRID T4-8Q vs RTXA5000-24Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID T4-8Q vs RTXA5000-24Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID T4-8Q vs RTXA5000-24Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID T4-8Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,221 less on MSRP ($2,500 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
✅Delivers 47.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 230W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RTXA5000-24Q

2021

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
48.8% HIGHER MSRP
$3,721 MSRPvs$2,500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
❌130% higher power demand at 230W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTXA5000-24Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (4,803 vs 4,762), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTXA5000-24Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID T4-8Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,221 cheaper on MSRP at $2,500 vs $3,721, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 47.6% (1.9 vs 1.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID T4-8Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTXA5000-24Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID T4-8Q vs RTXA5000-24Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID T4-8Q

The GRID T4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,762 points.

RTXA5000-24Q

The RTXA5000-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,803 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID T4-8Q scores 4,762 and the RTXA5000-24Q reaches 4,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the RTXA5000-24Q uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID T4-8Q) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-24Q). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID T4-8Q) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-24Q).

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	RTXA5000-24Q
G3D Mark Score	4,762	4,803
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1536	8192+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.218 TFLOPS	27.77 TFLOPS+1152%
ROPs	64	96+50%
TMUs	96	256+167%
L1 Cache	0.56 MB	8 MB+1329%
L2 Cache	2 MB	6 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTXA5000-24Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID T4-8Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	RTXA5000-24Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID T4-8Q and 64-bit on the RTXA5000-24Q. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID T4-8Q) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-24Q) — the RTXA5000-24Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	RTXA5000-24Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	6 MB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID T4-8Q draws 100W versus the RTXA5000-24Q's 230W — a 78.8% difference. The GRID T4-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-8Q) vs 350W (RTXA5000-24Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	RTXA5000-24Q
TDP	100W-57%	230W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	47.6+128%	20.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID T4-8Q came in at $2500, while the RTXA5000-24Q launched at $3721. On MSRP, GRID T4-8Q was 32.8% cheaper ($1221 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GRID T4-8Q) vs 1.3 (RTXA5000-24Q) — the GRID T4-8Q offers 46.2% better value. The newer card here is RTXA5000-24Q (2021 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID T4-8Q	RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP	$2500-33%	$3721
Performance per Dollar	1.9+46%	1.3
Codename	GM204	GA102
Release	August 30 2015	April 12 2021
Ranking	#535	#53

Search GRID T4-8Q on Amazon

Search RTXA5000-24Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.