
GeForce GTX 760 vs GRID T4-8Q

GeForce GTX 760
Popular choices:

GRID T4-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID T4-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 760 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID T4-8Q.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760 | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 760 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 760 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $1,000), it costs 97% less, resulting in a 3269% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760 | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3269%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 and GRID T4-8Q

GeForce GTX 760
The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.

GRID T4-8Q
The GRID T4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,762 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 scores 4,813 and the GRID T4-8Q reaches 4,762 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 is built on Kepler while the GRID T4-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 1,536 (GRID T4-8Q). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID T4-8Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,813+1% | 4,762 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152 | 1536+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.378 TFLOPS+7% | 2.218 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 576 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID T4-8Q has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 760 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760) vs 2 MB (GRID T4-8Q) — the GRID T4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 draws 170W versus the GRID T4-8Q's 100W — a 51.9% difference. The GRID T4-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760) vs 350W (GRID T4-8Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 100W-41% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.3 | 47.6+68% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 760 launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GRID T4-8Q launched at $2500 and now averages $1000. The GeForce GTX 760 costs 97% less ($970 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 160.4 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 4.8 (GRID T4-8Q) — the GeForce GTX 760 offers 3241.7% better value. The GRID T4-8Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 | GRID T4-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-90% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-97% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 160.4+3242% | 4.8 |
| Codename | GK104 | GM204 |
| Release | June 25 2013 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #450 | #535 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















