Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Radeon R9 370

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 16

2018Core: 815 MHzBoost: 1190 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 370

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 975 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro Vega 16

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 110W, a 35W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 31.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon R9 370

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 16: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 46.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro Vega 16 better than Radeon R9 370?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,809 vs 4,722 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling, plus much lower power draw (75W vs 110W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R9 370 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 4 GB instead of Unknown. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro Vega 16 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 1.8% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 370 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon R9 370 make more sense than Radeon Pro Vega 16?
Yes. Radeon R9 370 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $149 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro Vega 16. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro Vega 16 currently gives you 1.8% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 370 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 370
1080p
low79 FPS100 FPS
medium68 FPS85 FPS
high55 FPS68 FPS
ultra36 FPS40 FPS
1440p
low70 FPS87 FPS
medium60 FPS75 FPS
high43 FPS53 FPS
ultra28 FPS30 FPS
4K
low25 FPS27 FPS
medium23 FPS26 FPS
high15 FPS17 FPS
ultra13 FPS15 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 370
1080p
low111 FPS118 FPS
medium82 FPS87 FPS
high63 FPS67 FPS
ultra39 FPS41 FPS
1440p
low63 FPS67 FPS
medium43 FPS45 FPS
high31 FPS33 FPS
ultra21 FPS22 FPS
4K
low24 FPS24 FPS
medium16 FPS16 FPS
high13 FPS13 FPS
ultra9 FPS9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 370
1080p
low216 FPS212 FPS
medium173 FPS170 FPS
high144 FPS142 FPS
ultra108 FPS106 FPS
1440p
low162 FPS159 FPS
medium130 FPS127 FPS
high108 FPS106 FPS
ultra81 FPS80 FPS
4K
low108 FPS106 FPS
medium87 FPS85 FPS
high72 FPS71 FPS
ultra53 FPS53 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 370
1080p
low140 FPS136 FPS
medium111 FPS109 FPS
high92 FPS94 FPS
ultra74 FPS78 FPS
1440p
low101 FPS99 FPS
medium81 FPS82 FPS
high68 FPS71 FPS
ultra53 FPS55 FPS
4K
low60 FPS59 FPS
medium46 FPS45 FPS
high36 FPS35 FPS
ultra25 FPS25 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon R9 370

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 16

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 370

The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 4,809 and the Radeon R9 370 reaches 4,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Raw compute: 2.437 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370). Boost clocks: 1190 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 370
G3D Mark Score
4,809+2%
4,722
Architecture
GCN 5.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.437 TFLOPS
2.496 TFLOPS+2%
Boost Clock
1190 MHz+22%
975 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
80+25%
L1 Cache
256 KB
384 KB+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 370
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 370 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 370 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 370
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 370). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 370
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 370). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC (Radeon R9 370).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 370
Encoder
VCE 4.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 7.0
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 37.8% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 370
TDP
75W-32%
110W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
450W
Power Connector
Integrated
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
221mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80
75-6%
Perf/Watt
64.1+49%
42.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 370 launched at $149. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 costs 100+% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 31.7 (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 370
MSRP
$0-100%
$149
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
31.7
Codename
Vega 12
Trinidad
Release
November 14 2018
May 5 2015
Ranking
#451
#456