G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Radeon R9 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Radeon R9 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro Vega 16

2018

Why buy it

✅1.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 75W instead of 110W, a 35W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 31.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon R9 370

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅Radeon Pro Vega 16 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 370 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 16 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌46.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (4,809 vs 4,722), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 370 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 370 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon Pro Vega 16 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Radeon R9 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro Vega 16

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.

Radeon R9 370

The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 4,809 and the Radeon R9 370 reaches 4,722 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Raw compute: 2.437 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370). Boost clocks: 1190 MHz vs 975 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 16	Radeon R9 370
G3D Mark Score	4,809+2%	4,722
Architecture	GCN 5.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024	1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.437 TFLOPS	2.496 TFLOPS+2%
Boost Clock	1190 MHz+22%	975 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	80+25%
L1 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 16	Radeon R9 370
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 370 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 370 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 16 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 370. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 16	Radeon R9 370
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 370). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 16	Radeon R9 370
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 370). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC (Radeon R9 370).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 16	Radeon R9 370
Encoder	VCE 4.0	VCE 1.0
Decoder	UVD 7.0	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265	H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 37.8% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 16	Radeon R9 370
TDP	75W-32%	110W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	450W
Power Connector	Integrated	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	221mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80	75-6%
Perf/Watt	64.1+49%	42.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro Vega 16 came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 16 was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 31.7 (Radeon R9 370) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro Vega 16 (2018 vs 2015).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 16	Radeon R9 370
MSRP	$0-100%	$149
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	31.7
Codename	Vega 12	Trinidad
Release	November 14 2018	May 5 2015
Ranking	#451	#456

Search Radeon Pro Vega 16 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.