Radeon Pro Vega 16
VS
Radeon R9 270X

Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Radeon R9 270X

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 16

2018Core: 815 MHzBoost: 1190 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 270X

2013Boost: 1050 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 270X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 270X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Vega 16.

InsightRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 270X
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 270X remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 16 and Radeon R9 270X

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 16

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 270X

The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 4,809 and the Radeon R9 270X reaches 4,874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon R9 270X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X). Raw compute: 2.437 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 2.688 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270X). Boost clocks: 1190 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 270X
G3D Mark Score
4,809
4,874+1%
Architecture
GCN 5.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.437 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS+10%
Boost Clock
1190 MHz+13%
1050 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
80+25%
L1 Cache
256 KB
320 KB+25%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 270X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 270X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270X) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 270X
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 270X
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270X). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 270X).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 270X
Encoder
VCE 4.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 7.0
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 270X's 180W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270X). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80 C.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 270X
TDP
75W-58%
180W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
500W
Power Connector
Integrated
2x 6-pin
Length
0mm
241mm
Height
0mm
109mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80
80 C
Perf/Watt
64.1+137%
27.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon R9 270X launched at $199 and now averages $40. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 121.8 (Radeon R9 270X) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16Radeon R9 270X
MSRP
$0-100%
$199
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$40
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
121.8
Codename
Vega 12
Curacao
Release
November 14 2018
October 8 2013
Ranking
#451
#448