GeForce GTX 1630 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1630

2022Core: 1740 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 16

2018Core: 815 MHzBoost: 1190 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1630 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1630 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1630 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1630

2022

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon Pro Vega 16 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1630 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 16 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon Pro Vega 16

2018

Why buy it

  • 6.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1630 instead at 4,992 vs 4,809, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1630 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 14nm, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1630 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon Pro Vega 16 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1630 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1630

The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 16

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1630 scores 4,992 and the Radeon Pro Vega 16 reaches 4,809 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1630 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Raw compute: 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 2.437 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1190 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1630Radeon Pro Vega 16
G3D Mark Score
4,992+4%
4,809
Architecture
Turing
GCN 5.0
Process Node
12 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
512
1024+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.828 TFLOPS
2.437 TFLOPS+33%
Boost Clock
1785 MHz+50%
1190 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
64+100%
L1 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1630 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1630Radeon Pro Vega 16
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1630 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 1630 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GTX 1630 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 16.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1630Radeon Pro Vega 16
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1630Radeon Pro Vega 16
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1630) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro Vega 16).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1630Radeon Pro Vega 16
Encoder
NVENC 6th gen
VCE 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
UVD 7.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1630 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 16's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1630Radeon Pro Vega 16
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
300W
1W-100%
Power Connector
None
Integrated
Length
145mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
60°C-25%
80
Perf/Watt
66.6+4%
64.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1630 came in at $150, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 16 was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.3 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 16) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1630 (2022 vs 2018).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1630Radeon Pro Vega 16
MSRP
$150
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
33.3
Infinity
Codename
TU117
Vega 12
Release
June 28 2022
November 14 2018
Ranking
#444
#451

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.