Radeon R9 A375 vs FirePro M4150

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 A375 is positioned at rank 83 and the FirePro M4150 is on rank 211, so the Radeon R9 A375 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 A375

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

347%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

333%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

330%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

329%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

328%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

326%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

322%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

321%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

318%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

317%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

313%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

313%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

307%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

307%

#68

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

383%

#79

Iris Xe Graphics MAX

MSRP: $55|Avg: $40

70%

#80

GeForce RTX 5090

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700

69%

#83

Radeon R9 A375

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

100%

#85

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

98%

#86

Radeon R5 A6-7480

MSRP: $35|Avg: $30

95%

#87

GeForce GT 710

MSRP: $35|Avg: $50

85%

#89

GeForce GT 740

MSRP: $89|Avg: $89

77%

#90

Radeon R7 A8-7680

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

76%

#92

Radeon HD 7730

MSRP: $75|Avg: $15

74%

#93

Radeon 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

70%

#97

Radeon R7 A8-7690K

MSRP: $80|Avg: $40

68%

#98

GeForce GT 1010

MSRP: $70|Avg: $70

66%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro M4150

#91

RTX PRO 6000

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

99%

#92

RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

97%

#93

Quadro RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

97%

#196

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2920%

#211

FirePro M4150

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

100%

#212

FirePro V4900

MSRP: $200|Avg: $47

100%

#213

GRID K160Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $30

99%

#215

Quadro

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

99%

#216

FirePro W5000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

98%

#219

FirePro W7000 Adapter

MSRP: $899|Avg: $15

96%

#220

Quadro K420

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

96%

#223

FirePro W7000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $50

95%

#224

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

MSRP: $169|Avg: $100

94%

#226

FirePro D500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 A375 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro M4150 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon R9 A375	FirePro M4150
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 A375 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 A375 holds the technical lead. Priced at $49 (vs $50), it costs 2% less, resulting in a 3.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R9 A375	FirePro M4150
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+3.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($49)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 A375 Benchmark Check

FirePro M4150 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 A375 and FirePro M4150

Radeon R9 A375

The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.

FirePro M4150

The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 A375 scores 1,024 and the FirePro M4150 reaches 1,011 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 A375 is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro M4150 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 A375) vs 384 (FirePro M4150).

Feature	Radeon R9 A375	FirePro M4150
G3D Mark Score	1,024+1%	1,011
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	40+67%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 A375	FirePro M4150
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 A375 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro M4150 has 4 GB. The FirePro M4150 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon R9 A375	FirePro M4150
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 A375) vs 12 (FirePro M4150). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.

Feature	Radeon R9 A375	FirePro M4150
DirectX	12_0	12
Max Displays	0	6

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 A375) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4150). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD.

Feature	Radeon R9 A375	FirePro M4150
Encoder	VCE 2.0	VCE 1.0
Decoder	UVD 4.2	UVD
Codecs	—	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 A375 draws 30W versus the FirePro M4150's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R9 A375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 A375) vs 350W (FirePro M4150). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Radeon R9 A375	FirePro M4150
TDP	30W-80%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	34.1+409%	6.7

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 A375 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the FirePro M4150 launched at $200 and now averages $50. The Radeon R9 A375 costs 2% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.9 (Radeon R9 A375) vs 20.2 (FirePro M4150) — the Radeon R9 A375 offers 3.5% better value. The Radeon R9 A375 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).