Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon 535
Radeon R9 A375
Popular choices:
Radeon 535
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 A375 is positioned at rank 83 and the Radeon 535 is on rank 119, so the Radeon R9 A375 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 A375
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 535
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 535 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 A375.
| Insight | Radeon R9 A375 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 A375 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 A375 holds the technical lead. Priced at $49 (vs $100), it costs 51% less, resulting in a 99.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 A375 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+99.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 A375 and Radeon 535
Radeon R9 A375
The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.
Radeon 535
The Radeon 535 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 A375 scores 1,024 and the Radeon 535 reaches 1,049 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 A375 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 535 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 A375) vs 512 (Radeon 535). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 A375 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,024 | 1,049+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+25% | 512 |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1183 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 A375 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 A375 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 A375 draws 30W versus the Radeon 535's 50W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R9 A375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 A375) vs 300W (Radeon 535). Power connectors: None vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R9 A375 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 34.1+62% | 21.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 A375 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon 535 launched at $100 and now averages $100. The Radeon R9 A375 costs 51% less ($51 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.9 (Radeon R9 A375) vs 10.5 (Radeon 535) — the Radeon R9 A375 offers 99% better value. The Radeon 535 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 A375 | Radeon 535 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-51% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-51% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.9+99% | 10.5 |
| Codename | Venus | Lexa |
| Release | 2015 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #877 | #668 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 A375 and Radeon 535
