Radeon R9 A375 vs UHD Graphics 620

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 A375 is positioned at rank #83 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 A375

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

347%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

333%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

330%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

329%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

328%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

326%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

322%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

321%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

318%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

317%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

313%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

313%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

307%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

307%

#68

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

383%

#79

Iris Xe Graphics MAX

MSRP: $55|Avg: $40

70%

#80

GeForce RTX 5090

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700

69%

#83

Radeon R9 A375

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

100%

#85

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

98%

#86

Radeon R5 A6-7480

MSRP: $35|Avg: $30

95%

#87

GeForce GT 710

MSRP: $35|Avg: $50

85%

#89

GeForce GT 740

MSRP: $89|Avg: $89

77%

#90

Radeon R7 A8-7680

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

76%

#92

Radeon HD 7730

MSRP: $75|Avg: $15

74%

#93

Radeon 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

70%

#97

Radeon R7 A8-7690K

MSRP: $80|Avg: $40

68%

#98

GeForce GT 1010

MSRP: $70|Avg: $70

66%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 A375 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon R9 A375	Intel UHD Graphics 620
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 620 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 A375 Benchmark Check

Intel UHD Graphics 620 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 A375 and Intel UHD Graphics 620

Radeon R9 A375

The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.

Intel UHD Graphics 620

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,041 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 A375 scores 1,024 and the Intel UHD Graphics 620 reaches 1,041 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 A375 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 620 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 A375) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R9 A375	Intel UHD Graphics 620
G3D Mark Score	1,024	1,041+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Generation 9.5
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm++
Shading Units	640+233%	192
Boost Clock	925 MHz	1000 MHz+8%
ROPs	16+433%	3
TMUs	40+67%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 A375	Intel UHD Graphics 620
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 A375 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 620 has 0 MB. The Radeon R9 A375 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

Feature	Radeon R9 A375	Intel UHD Graphics 620
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 A375) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon R9 A375	Intel UHD Graphics 620
DirectX	12_0	12
Max Displays	0	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 A375) vs QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs QuickSync.

Feature	Radeon R9 A375	Intel UHD Graphics 620
Encoder	VCE 2.0	QuickSync
Decoder	UVD 4.2	QuickSync
Codecs	—	H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 A375 draws 30W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 620's 15W — a 66.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 A375) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.

Feature	Radeon R9 A375	Intel UHD Graphics 620
TDP	30W	15W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	None	Integrated
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	34.1	69.4+104%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 A375 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Intel UHD Graphics 620 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 costs 100+% less ($49 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.9 (Radeon R9 A375) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 620) — the Intel UHD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).