Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro FX 4800

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 A375 is positioned at rank 83 and the Quadro FX 4800 is on rank 379, so the Radeon R9 A375 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 A375

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

347%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

333%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

330%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

329%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

328%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

326%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

322%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

321%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

318%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

317%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

313%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

313%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

307%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

307%

#68

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

383%

#79

Iris Xe Graphics MAX

MSRP: $55|Avg: $40

70%

#80

GeForce RTX 5090

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700

69%

#83

Radeon R9 A375

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

100%

#85

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

98%

#86

Radeon R5 A6-7480

MSRP: $35|Avg: $30

95%

#87

GeForce GT 710

MSRP: $35|Avg: $50

85%

#89

GeForce GT 740

MSRP: $89|Avg: $89

77%

#90

Radeon R7 A8-7680

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

76%

#92

Radeon HD 7730

MSRP: $75|Avg: $15

74%

#93

Radeon 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

70%

#97

Radeon R7 A8-7690K

MSRP: $80|Avg: $40

68%

#98

GeForce GT 1010

MSRP: $70|Avg: $70

66%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4800

#364

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

26380%

#379

Quadro FX 4800

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80

100%

#380

Tesla M2090

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40

100%

#381

GRID K2

MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80

95%

#382

GRID K180Q

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000

95%

#383

Quadro CX

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500

84%

#384

GRID P100-8Q

MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550

79%

#385

Quadro FX 550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $10

77%

#386

Quadro FX 350

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

77%

#387

GRID V100D-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

75%

#388

Tesla M2070

MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50

75%

#389

GRID M10-0Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

71%

#390

Quadro FX 560

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

68%

#391

GRID V100-2Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $2000

68%

#392

Quadro FX 5800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40

62%

#393

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

57%

#394

FireStream 9170

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $20

57%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R9 A375 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The Radeon R9 A375 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 4800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 A375 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 4800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon R9 A375	Quadro FX 4800
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+200%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 A375 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 A375 holds the technical lead. Priced at $49 (vs $80), it costs 39% less, resulting in a 66.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R9 A375	Quadro FX 4800
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+66.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($49)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 A375 Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 4800 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 A375 and Quadro FX 4800

Radeon R9 A375

The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.

Quadro FX 4800

The Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $1,799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 A375 scores 1,024 and the Quadro FX 4800 reaches 1,005 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 A375 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 4800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 A375) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4800).

Feature	Radeon R9 A375	Quadro FX 4800
G3D Mark Score	1,024+2%	1,005
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	640+233%	192
ROPs	16	24+50%
TMUs	40	64+60%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 A375	Quadro FX 4800
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 A375 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4800 has 2 GB. The Quadro FX 4800 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon R9 A375	Quadro FX 4800
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1.5 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 A375 draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 4800's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R9 A375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 A375) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4800). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R9 A375	Quadro FX 4800
TDP	30W-80%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	34.1+409%	6.7

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 A375 launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Quadro FX 4800 launched at $1799 and now averages $80. The Radeon R9 A375 costs 38.8% less ($31 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.9 (Radeon R9 A375) vs 12.6 (Quadro FX 4800) — the Radeon R9 A375 offers 65.9% better value. The Radeon R9 A375 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).