
Radeon R9 Fury vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Radeon R9 Fury
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 Fury lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 Fury is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile.
| Insight | Radeon R9 Fury | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 Fury offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $150 for the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile, it costs 67% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 200.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 Fury | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+200.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 Fury and GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Radeon R9 Fury
The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1238 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,494 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 Fury scores 9,521 and the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile reaches 9,494 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Fury is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury) vs 2,048 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,521 | 9,494 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+75% | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1500 MHz+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) — a 166.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+167% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+3100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury) vs NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC 8.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | PureVideo HD VP11 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 Fury draws 275W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile's 60W — a 128.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon R9 Fury) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 195mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 60W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 195mm | 0mm |
| Height | 115mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 34.6 | 158.2+357% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 Fury costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 190.4 (Radeon R9 Fury) vs 63.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile) — the Radeon R9 Fury offers 200.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-67% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 190.4+201% | 63.3 |
| Codename | Fiji | GN20-P0 |
| Release | July 10 2015 | May 11 2021 |
| Ranking | #274 | #286 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















