Radeon R9 Fury vs RTX A2000 Mobile
Radeon R9 Fury
Popular choices:
RTX A2000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A2000 Mobile is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The RTX A2000 Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 Fury lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 Fury is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A2000 Mobile.
| Insight | Radeon R9 Fury | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 Fury remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 Fury and RTX A2000 Mobile
Radeon R9 Fury
The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.
RTX A2000 Mobile
The RTX A2000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1687 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,506 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 Fury scores 9,521 and the RTX A2000 Mobile reaches 9,506 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Fury is built on GCN 3.0 while the RTX A2000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Raw compute: 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury) vs 8.637 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1687 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,521 | 9,506 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+40% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.168 TFLOPS | 8.637 TFLOPS+20% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1687 MHz+69% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 224+180% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 2.5 MB+184% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+3100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Mobile). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 Fury draws 275W versus the RTX A2000 Mobile's 95W — a 97.3% difference. The RTX A2000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon R9 Fury) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Mobile). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 195mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 95W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 195mm | 0mm |
| Height | 115mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 34.6 | 100.1+189% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A2000 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | — |
| Codename | Fiji | GA107 |
| Release | July 10 2015 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #274 | #273 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 Fury and RTX A2000 Mobile
