
Radeon 8040S vs Radeon R9 Fury

Radeon 8040S
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 Fury
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 8040S is positioned at rank #216 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 8040S
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 8040S is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The Radeon 8040S likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 Fury lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 8040S is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 Fury.
| Insight | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 Fury offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $400 for the Radeon 8040S, it costs 88% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 680.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+680.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 8040S and Radeon R9 Fury

Radeon 8040S
The Radeon 8040S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,756 points.

Radeon R9 Fury
The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 8040S scores 9,756 and the Radeon R9 Fury reaches 9,521 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 8040S is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon R9 Fury uses GCN 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon 8040S) vs 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury). Raw compute: 5.734 TFLOPS (Radeon 8040S) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury). Boost clocks: 2800 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,756+2% | 9,521 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 3584+250% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.734 TFLOPS | 7.168 TFLOPS+25% |
| Boost Clock | 2800 MHz+180% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 224+250% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon 8040S) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury) — the Radeon 8040S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 512 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 4096-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 8040S) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8040S) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8040S) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury).
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 8040S draws 55W versus the Radeon R9 Fury's 275W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 8040S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon 8040S) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 195mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-80% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 195mm |
| Height | 0mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 177.4+413% | 34.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 8040S launched at $400 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the Radeon R9 Fury launched at $549 and now averages $50. The Radeon R9 Fury costs 87.5% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.4 (Radeon 8040S) vs 190.4 (Radeon R9 Fury) — the Radeon R9 Fury offers 680.3% better value. The Radeon 8040S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon 8040S | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400-27% | $549 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $50-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.4 | 190.4+680% |
| Codename | Strix Halo | Fiji |
| Release | January 6 2025 | July 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #265 | #274 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















