CPU
GPU
Radeon R9 Fury X
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 Fury X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX TITAN Black offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 Fury X | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 Fury X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 Fury X holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $120), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 53.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 Fury X | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+53.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($80) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 Fury X and GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Radeon R9 Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 Fury X scores 9,382 and the GeForce GTX TITAN Black reaches 9,177 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Fury X is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 980 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,382+2% | 9,177 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+42% | 2880 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.602 TFLOPS+52% | 5.645 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz+7% | 980 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 256+7% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+335% | 0.23 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 Fury X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — a 52.4% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury X. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — the Radeon R9 Fury X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | HBM | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+52% | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+967% | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 Fury X draws 275W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Black's 250W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 195mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 250W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 600W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 195mm | 267mm |
| Height | 115mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-25% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 34.1 | 36.7+8% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 Fury X launched at $649 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black launched at $999 and now averages $120. The Radeon R9 Fury X costs 33.3% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 117.3 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 76.5 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — the Radeon R9 Fury X offers 53.3% better value. The Radeon R9 Fury X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649-35% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-33% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 117.3+53% | 76.5 |
| Codename | Fiji | GK110B |
| Release | June 24 2015 | February 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #282 | #288 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 Fury X and GeForce GTX TITAN Black
