Radeon R9 Fury X vs RTX A2000 Mobile

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 Fury X vs RTX A2000 Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 Fury X vs RTX A2000 Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 Fury X

2015

Why buy it

✅6.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌189.5% higher power demand at 275W vs 95W.

RTX A2000 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 95W instead of 275W, a 180W reduction.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 Fury X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX A2000 Mobile instead at 9,506 vs 9,382, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A2000 Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 20 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 Fury X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 Fury X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX A2000 Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R9 Fury X vs RTX A2000 Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.

RTX A2000 Mobile

The RTX A2000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1687 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,506 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 Fury X scores 9,382 and the RTX A2000 Mobile reaches 9,506 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Fury X is built on GCN 3.0 while the RTX A2000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 8.637 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1687 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R9 Fury X	RTX A2000 Mobile
G3D Mark Score	9,382	9,506+1%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	4096+60%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.602 TFLOPS	8.637 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1050 MHz	1687 MHz+61%
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	256+220%	80
L1 Cache	1 MB	2.5 MB+150%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A2000 Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 Fury X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Radeon R9 Fury X	RTX A2000 Mobile
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury X and 128-bit on the RTX A2000 Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R9 Fury X	RTX A2000 Mobile
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	HBM	GDDR6
Bus Width	4096-bit+3100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon R9 Fury X	RTX A2000 Mobile
DirectX	12.0	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Mobile). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Mobile).

Feature	Radeon R9 Fury X	RTX A2000 Mobile
Encoder	VCE 3.0	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	UVD 6.0	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 Fury X draws 275W versus the RTX A2000 Mobile's 95W — a 97.3% difference. The RTX A2000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Mobile). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 195mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon R9 Fury X	RTX A2000 Mobile
TDP	275W	95W-65%
Recommended PSU	600W	500W-17%
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	195mm	0mm
Height	115mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	60°C-25%	80°C
Perf/Watt	34.1	100.1+194%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX A2000 Mobile (2021 vs 2015).

Feature	Radeon R9 Fury X	RTX A2000 Mobile
MSRP	$649	—
Codename	Fiji	GA107
Release	June 24 2015	April 12 2021
Ranking	#282	#273

Search Radeon R9 Fury X on Amazon

Search RTX A2000 Mobile on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.