Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Quadro P2200 vs Radeon R9 Fury X

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

Quadro P2200

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1493 MHz
Similar parts
·····
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 Fury X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Quadro P2200 vs Radeon R9 Fury X Performance Spectrum

Quadro P2200
5 GB 75
9,386
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce MX570 A
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX Titan
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 12GB
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Radeon R9 Fury X
4 GB 275
9,382
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
brand logoRadeon R9 380X
brand logoRadeon RX 470 (móvel)
brand logoRadeon RX590 GME
brand logoRadeon RX 6800M
brand logoRadeon RX 6650M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6750 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 7800 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P2200 vs Radeon R9 Fury X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Quadro P2200
low81 FPS
medium69 FPS
high56 FPS
ultra37 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 Fury X
low92 FPS
medium80 FPS
high65 FPS
ultra45 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Quadro P2200
low156 FPS
medium120 FPS
high89 FPS
ultra61 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 Fury X
low243 FPS
medium205 FPS
high162 FPS
ultra133 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Quadro P2200
low333 FPS
medium295 FPS
high220 FPS
ultra184 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 Fury X
low422 FPS
medium338 FPS
high281 FPS
ultra211 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Quadro P2200
low147 FPS
medium120 FPS
high103 FPS
ultra87 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 Fury X
low160 FPS
medium133 FPS
high115 FPS
ultra98 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Quadro P2200
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 Fury X
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Quadro P2200
low138 FPS
medium119 FPS
high99 FPS
ultra79 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 Fury X
low189 FPS
medium166 FPS
high135 FPS
ultra113 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Quadro P2200
low71 FPS
medium54 FPS
high45 FPS
ultra32 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 Fury X
low81 FPS
medium64 FPS
high52 FPS
ultra37 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Quadro P2200
low51 FPS
medium35 FPS
high28 FPS
ultra22 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 Fury X
low76 FPS
medium53 FPS
high44 FPS
ultra36 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Quadro P2200
low79 FPS
medium62 FPS
high51 FPS
ultra40 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 Fury X
low108 FPS
medium92 FPS
high71 FPS
ultra62 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Quadro P2200
low73 FPS
medium57 FPS
high45 FPS
ultra35 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 Fury X
low91 FPS
medium77 FPS
high64 FPS
ultra47 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Quadro P2200 vs Radeon R9 Fury X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P2200

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 51.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 14.5 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • ✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 4 GB).
  • ✅Radeon R9 Fury X is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P2200 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 75W instead of 275W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon R9 Fury X

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅32.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ✅Measures 195mm instead of 201mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    51.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $649 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
  • ❌266.7% higher power demand at 275W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 Fury X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 32.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P2200 instead at 9,386 vs 9,382, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P2200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 5 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P2200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $220 cheaper on MSRP at $429 vs $649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 51.3% (21.9 vs 14.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 Fury X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro P2200 vs Radeon R9 Fury X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2200

The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2200 scores 9,386 and the Radeon R9 Fury X reaches 9,382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P2200) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Raw compute: 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury X). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon R9 Fury X
G3D Mark Score
9,386
9,382
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 3.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
4096+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.822 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS+125%
Boost Clock
1493 MHz+42%
1050 MHz
ROPs
40
64+60%
TMUs
80
256+220%
L1 Cache
0.47 MB
1 MB+113%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
2 MB+60%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon R9 Fury X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P2200 has 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury X carries 4 GB. Quadro P2200 gives you 25% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P2200 and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury X. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the Radeon R9 Fury X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon R9 Fury X
VRAM Capacity
5 GB+25%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
HBM
Bus Width
256-bit
4096-bit+1500%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
2 MB+60%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P2200) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon R9 Fury X
DirectX
12.1
12.0
Vulkan
1.4+17%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X).

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon R9 Fury X
Encoder
6th Gen NVENC
VCE 3.0
Decoder
3rd Gen NVDEC
UVD 6.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2200 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 Fury X's 275W — a 114.3% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P2200) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 201mm vs 195mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 60°C.

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon R9 Fury X
TDP
75W-73%
275W
Recommended PSU
500W-17%
600W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 8-pin
Length
201mm
195mm
Height
111mm
115mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
60°C-20%
Perf/Watt
125.1+267%
34.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P2200 came in at $429, while the Radeon R9 Fury X launched at $649. On MSRP, Quadro P2200 was 33.9% cheaper ($220 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.9 (Quadro P2200) vs 14.5 (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the Quadro P2200 offers 51% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P2200 (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureQuadro P2200Radeon R9 Fury X
MSRP
$429-34%
$649
Performance per Dollar
21.9+51%
14.5
Codename
GP106
Fiji
Release
June 10 2019
June 24 2015
Ranking
#281
#282
Search Quadro P2200 on AmazonSearch Radeon R9 Fury X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.